After some initial growth, it seems like the CSS-in-JS sector has plateaued, and the fact that native CSS itself is adopting many of its main advantages is probably a big contributing factor.
Link to sectionExperience Over Time
Compare Data
Retention, interest, usage, and awareness ratio over time.
| Styled Components | |
| JSS | |
| Styled JSX | |
| Emotion | |
| CSS Modules | |
| Styled System | |
| Stitches | |
| Theme UI | |
| vanilla-extract | |
| Windi CSS |
Technologies with less than 10% awareness not included. Each ratio is defined as follows:
- Retention: would use again / (would use again + would not use again)
- Interest: want to learn / (want to learn + not interested)
- Usage: (would use again + would not use again) / total
- Awareness: (total - never heard) / total
Link to sectionExperience Over Time
Overview of opinions on the technologies surveyed over time.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Technologies with only one year of data are not included.
Link to sectionPositive/Negative Split
This chart splits positive (“want to learn”, “would use again”) vs negative (“not interested”, “would not use again”) experiences on both sides of a central axis.
Bar thickness represents the number of respondents aware of a technology.
Link to sectionOther Tools
Compare Data
Link to sectionOverall Happiness
Compare Data
Link to sectionRecommended Resources
Brian Holt
Snowflake
Intermediate React, v5
Learn to build scalable React applications using the latest tools and techniques available in the React ecosystem! This course is modular,
where you can pick and choose various react ecosystems you want to learn.
Thanks to our partners for supporting us! Learn more.
Link to sectionStyled Components
Comments9
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Styled Components.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Comments2
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with JSS.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionStyled JSX
Comments2
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Styled JSX.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionEmotion
Comments4
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Emotion.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionCSS Modules
Comments8
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with CSS Modules.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionStyled System
Comments2
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Styled System.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionStitches
Comments8
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Stitches.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionTheme UI
Comments2
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Theme UI.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionvanilla-extract
Comments4
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with vanilla-extract.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |
Link to sectionWindi CSS
Comments15
Compare Data
Respondent's experience with Windi CSS.
| Would use again | |
| Would not use | |
| Interested | |
| Not interested | |
| Never heard |