Skip to content

State of CSS 2023

Frameworks CSS

Once again, Tailwind CSS stands apart as the one major UI framework that developers are happy to keep using; while Open Props is generating a small but passionate following.

Ratios Over Time

Compare Data
Retention, interest, usage, and awareness ratio over time.
Bootstrap
Materialize CSS
Ant Design
Semantic UI/Fomantic UI
Bulma
Foundation
UIKit
Tachyons
Tailwind CSS
PureCSS
Open Props
Blaze UI
UnoCSS

Technologies with less than 10% awareness not included. Each ratio is defined as follows:

  • Retention: would use again / (would use again + would not use again)
  • Interest: want to learn / (want to learn + not interested)
  • Usage: (would use again + would not use again) / total
  • Awareness: (total - never heard) / total
💡
El gràfic de Rànquings es pot alternar entre satisfacció, interès, ús i consciència per donar-te una imatge més completa del rànquing d'una categoria.

Experiència al llarg del temps

Visió general de les opinions sobre les tecnologies enquestades al llarg del temps.
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

No s'hi inclouen les tecnologies amb dades de fa només un any.

Divisió positiva/negativa

Aquest gràfic divideix experiències positives ("vull aprendre'n", "ho tornaria a utilitzar") vs negatives ("sense interès", "no ho tornaria a utilitzar") a banda i banda d'un eix central.

El gruix de la barra representa el nombre de persones que han respòs que coneixen una tecnologia.

We asked members of the CSS community to share their “pick of the year”

My 2023 Pick: Scroll-Driven Animations

If I went back 2 years, I'd never have imagined CSS having scroll-driven animations. Yet, here we are!

We asked members of the CSS community to share their “pick of the year”

Ahmad Shadeed

Design Engineer and Writer at ishadeed.com

Altres eines

Compare Data

Satisfacció general

Compare Data
6364 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (69.3% completion percentage)

Bootstrap

Comments29
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Bootstrap.
6814 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (74.2% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Materialize CSS

Comments6
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Materialize CSS.
6802 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (74.1% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Ant Design

Comments3
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Ant Design.
6796 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (74% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Semantic UI/Fomantic UI

Comments1
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Semantic UI/Fomantic UI.
6791 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.9% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Bulma

Comments1
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Bulma.
6787 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.9% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Foundation

Comments5
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Foundation.
6780 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.8% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

UIKit

Comments2
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en UIKit.
6776 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.8% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Tachyons

Comments3
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Tachyons.
6770 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.7% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Tailwind CSS

Comments31
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Tailwind CSS.
6805 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (74.1% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

PureCSS

Comments2
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en PureCSS.
6774 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.8% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Open Props

Comments5
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Open Props.
6755 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.6% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

Blaze UI

Comments2
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en Blaze UI.
6771 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.7% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona

UnoCSS

Comments3
Compare Data
Experiència de la persona enquestada en UnoCSS.
6772 question respondents out of 9190 survey participants (73.7% completion percentage)
Ho tornaria a usar
No ho usaria
M'interessa
No m'interessa
No em sona